3d Printing Technology Essay

legitimatize Concerns Facing 3D impression TechnologyExecutive SummaryThis question journal condition discusses how 3D mental picture engineering whitethorn military case federal firearms regulations. The focus of the hold is that, due to the development of 3D Printing engineering science, individuals, even people without technical expertise, now set out the ability to part the bare-ass technology to arrive guns at home much more(prenominal) easily than they ever pass on before. This behavior might bring commodious harm to society. However, if a comprehensive prohibition on using 3D Printers to manufacture personal weapons were implemented, it might defy the 2008 District of Columbia v. daemon Supreme Court decision. In fact, the increasing touristedity of 3D Printing heart natural lawmakers must decide soon whether or non to allow 3D Printing of weapons. 3D Printing either should only be allowed to produce things that cannot be apply as lethal weapons.Or, secondl y, it can be used to produce a physical, working gun. The second option might attain advances in 3D printing technology and promote the development of firearms design. However, developments in 3D Printing technology argon creating concerns that not only consistent consumers but also criminals are able to print firearms at home. If the law doesnt allow individuals to use 3D printers to manufacturer personal weapons analogous handguns, it might be il effective according to the Second Amendment of the Constitution, a supply which protects the right of individuals to possess firearms under the law. Specifically, under the 2nd Amendment individuals whitethorn have the right to create their take firearms for self-defense, and the right to the manufacture firearms technology and materials. depth psychology and CritiqueIn fact, 3D Printing technology is not mark new. This technology has been undergoing development for more than a decade. The reason it became more popular recently is because of decreasing usage costs, so more and more individuals have the opportunity to own 3D Printers for personal use. In my analysis and reappraisal of this journal condition, I will focus on three contrastive areas how whole most does it deliver information to the reader, how the product will evolve in the future, and what is my opinion of concern about 3D Printing technology join to firearms production after reading this journal article.First of all, this article is well organized and divided into four parts. The first part introduces what 3D Printing is, and how it is possible to produce firearms using the technology. The second part explains why the trade and production of firearms are limited under federal regulations, and provides an overall lookout man of the firearm patience. pop three includes explanations of how 3D printers may change firearms production. Finally, Part four describes the constitutional right to bear arms, and it also analyzes the extent to whi ch daimons case may limit prohibitions on 3D Printing. Moreover, this article provides other critical information to explain key points. It is a very valuable introduction for a reader without a background in the subject who might not be very familiar with the IT industry or with the relevant legislation. Based on the data and supporting flesh out provided by the motive, readers will have a basic idea of the profound issues concerning the intersection of 3D Printing and weaponry. As a result, it relates the technology to heavy(a) concerns about public security, and the author gives great examples of the various legal arguments on the theme. Therefore, I think this article is a valuable qualitative article that can expand peoples knowledge on the subject.Secondly, as well concerns about guns, there are no other disadvantages to the improvement of 3D Printing, which will make the operating cost of the technology increasingly cheap. Jensen-Haxel explains how 3D Printing actuall y works in his articleThe process begins with a digital 3D mystify created using Computer Added Design ( detent) software. The software automatically slices the model into a stack of thin naiant cross-sections about 0.1mm in height. The, 3D printer then builds the physical model by depositing material layer by layer.At the same time, 3D Printers are getting smaller and smaller, which will make it easier for consumers to have their own machines at home. This changes the old production model. Nowadays, people are allowed to produce whatsoever they want using a 3D Printer, all they need are the required data and materials. In fact, because of the development of the Internet, it iseasier than ever for people to let out these resources online. Evans states thatThe quickest way to get started with 3D printing is simply to descry models online that others have already created and shared on the Internet. The online 3D printing fellowship is growing all the time, so more and more thing s are organism shared every day.Therefore, the limitations of self-production have shifted from hardware difficulties to software or materials issues. The technology is becoming simpler to use, but it might harm light manufacturing industries because some designers may be able to use their own 3D Printers to produce a sample instead of finding established producers that use traditional manufacturing methods. Because of these improvements, the potence for 3D Printing is bright, but the light manufacturing industry might be negatively affected by it.Finally, the author argues that the rapid improvement of 3D Printing and the increasing convenience for individuals to produce things with it is both a study concern and a tremendous possibility. Should individuals receive the right to do whatsoever they want with 3D Printing technology, even the ability to print firearms? The topic of gun safety has become especially relevant since the school slam in Newton, Connecticut last year. More and more people are arguing about if the government should make some changes to firearms regulation.Jensen-Haxel wrote in his article that As the power of production passes from industry to consumer, many areas of the law may be caught unprepared. (P.448) Concerns about the rate of technological progress outpacing regulations are not limited to 3D Printing. Because of the relentless improvements to technology, more and more challenges will go across as regulators try to manage new technology. The fact is, in just about cases, laws only change after a new problem occurs, which nub that new products will often exist in a legal gray area before rules can be changed. How the government deals with this issue might be a big concern in the quest decades.To sum up, this article first introduces 3D Printing technology, and gives an example how 3D Printing has been used to print a firearm. As a result, the author relates this new technology to a regulatory concern. Within his argument, h e provides dissever of legal information, and then tries to point out a fact that some gray areas exist because regulation usually develops slower than a new technology can. Back to this article, is seems like the future of 3D Printing technology in unclear until the government resolves the legal issues concerning manufacturing weapons with this technology. ReferenceEvans, B. (2012). Practical 3D printers the science and art of 3D printing. New York Apress. Jensen-Haxel, Peter (2012). 3D Printers, disused Firearm Supply Controls, and the Right to Build Self-Defense Weapons Under Heller. gilded Gate University Law Review May2012, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p447-496, 50p