'Explain why Germany and her allies were defeated in WWI and assess their treatment in the 1918/1919 settlement\r'

'There were many factors that played a part in Germanys defeat in ground contend One, and none of them can be singularly attributed to its loss. Despite this, some factors did play a to a greater extent important part than early(a)s. Some of the study factors were Americas entranceway into the state of fight, low morale in Germany, and Germanys Ludendorrf violative.\r\nThe American innovation into the war was a major factor bestow to Germanys defeat. When the Americans declared war on Germany on April 6, 1917, they provided a huge injection of funds, soldiers and productive capacity to the everyy war effort. The millions of American soldiers that were sent all overseas in 1917 and 1918 were fit, young, and about importantly, fresh with relatively high morale compared to the other allied soldiers.\r\n humanity war One was a war of attrition. The side that could wear down the oppositeness side first would be victorious. The contribution of the American soldiers, funds and resources to the Allied side allowed them to survive for womb-to-tomb than the Central Powers. Therefore, the enattempt of America into World War One was a major factor create Germanys defeat.\r\nThe Ludendorrf foul-smelling, which was launched on March 21, 1918, was a series of triad offensives undertaken by the Germans to try to force an Allied giving up subsequently the Russian withdrew from the war. With the Eastern front free, the Germans grueling all their resources on the Western front to try to break the stalemate there.\r\nAt first the Ludendorrf Offensive was successful, but the German serviceman advanced so fast that their supply lines could not keep up. This allowed the Allied forces to surround and defeat the stranded German troops. The Ludendorrf Offensive was a gamble by Germany. It required an scuttlebutt of high levels of resources, and as it was not successful, these resources were ultimately wasted. As World War One was a war of attrition, the Ludendor rf Offensive accelerated, if not caused, Germanys defeat.\r\nBy 1917 and 1918, morale amongst the German people was very low. They had begun to lose faith in the war. An outbreak of Spanish Influenza in europium had hit Germany, and had created unrest amongst the population. Shortages of consumer essentials spread widely throughout Germany. The Germany public began to resent the war, calling for â€Å" slumber at any cost”. The production of munitions fell, and the weapons supply to the German soldiers fell to levels much lower than the assort. The low morale amongst the civilians and soldiers worsened the German position. Therefore, low morale amongst the troops and civilians on the German side was a major factor leading to Germanys defeat in World War One.\r\nThere is no obvious virtuoso factor for Germanys defeat in World War One, but among the main reasons were the Americans entry into the war, the Ludendorrf Offensive, and the low morale among soldiers and civilians a t the home front.\r\nThe treaty of Versailles was the culmination of the 1918/1919 peace settlement process that was imposed on Germany by the Allied powers in 1919. The treaty imposed a number of harsh conditions on Germany. As a result of the treaty, Germany had to reduce its army to 100 000 men, and conk up its air force altogether. Germany had to give onward thirteen percent of its land, and hand over sustain of its overseas colonies. Germany was forced to pay over �6, 600, 000, 000 in war repatriations. Also, and significantly, the Treaty of Versailles demanded Germany accept full function for starting the First World War.\r\nTo assess Germanys intervention in the 1918/1919 settlement, it is useful to examine the motives behind the appoint negotiators, Germanys aims, and Germanys guilt\r\nThe British public were very sore and were out for revenge. â€Å"Hang the Kaiser” and â€Å"Make Germany Pay” were some(prenominal) very common calls in the cartridge clip and after the war and the British Prime minister of religion David Lloyd George could not afford politically to be hands-down on Germany. This shows that Britains intentions when contributing to the Treaty of Versailles would have been to gratingly punish Germany\r\nThe then president of France, Georges Clemenceau, was determined to happen that Germany was punished so harshly that it would never be able to start a war again, as he believed they had done. As was the case with the British, there was excessively widespread public anger towards Germany.\r\nThe American President, Woodrow Wilson, was the three major participant in the treaty negotiations. He too wanted to punish Germany, but as well had an interest in a stable Europe, which would be on a stable Germany.\r\n give the attitudes of the Allies who met in Paris for the peace negotiations, Germanys treatment in the Treaty of Versailles would definitely have been harsh, as all three entered the negotiat ions with a view to punishing Germany.\r\nWhen judged by its previous actions, it can be argues that Germany was not warrant to expect a settlement any to a greater extent favourable than what they received. They had already proven that in advantage they could be as harsh as the Allies with the treaty they presented Russia upon their withdrawal from the war, the Brest-Litovsk Treaty. In this treaty, the Germans demanded that Russia hand over large areas of its territory and pay substantial repatriations.\r\nGiven the harsh treatment the Germans imposed on Russia after its defeat, the treatment of Germany in the Treaty of Versailles can be justified. There is an argument that if Germany had won, they would have imposed penalties as harsh or harsher on the Allies. This supports the argument that the Treaty of Versailles was not too harsh on Germany.\r\n unless perhaps the best way to determine whether or not the Treaty of Versailles was really harsh on Germany is to see the effect o n Germany of the treaty, and the length of time it took for Germany to recover.\r\n'