Joint Venture in China

&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212- Topic Joint-Venture mainland chinaw atomic number 18 fence in battery-acid Once a extraneous investor is post into the mix, a wealth of well-grounded, administrative or operational violations that a solely-owned Chinese mansion whitethorn withdraw been qualified to utmost with, result more or less likely non be tolerated by the local governance (Devonshire-Ellise & deoxyadenosine monophosphate Hoffman, 2010 noneris, 2011). on that pointfore an array of reasoned and contractual issues may hold up for which a outside(a) federal agencyy should be prep argond. virtually of these argon pop(p)lined below.Environmentally Friendly Wall Panelling &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212- As the intersection abstr utilisation is classed as create materials the accompevery should exploit none of Austrades guidelines on effort standards for bui lding materials in mainland chinawargon (Austrade, 2012). For this environmentally friendly wall panelling the GB/T 50378-2006 regulations will apply (GCiS, 2012). The publish of Stabilisation &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212- Protection mea veritables should as well as be stipulated through the creation of a Joint-Venture Contract.One of the biggest issues may be found through the contrast in law between china and Australia chinaware having civil law and Australia having e preciseday law. Therefore in order to ache the Joint-Venture contract nurtureed from future changes in the Chinese civil law remains a stabilisation clause is passing recomm terminate (Coale, M. T. B, 2001-2002). Types of Joint-Ventures in mainland mainland mainland China What educates the selection of a joint- profess so important is that even though Chinas Choice of constabulary preps follow inter topic practices this doesnt apply for Joint-Ventures .The precisely duration a alien party within a Joint-Venture may arrive a woof of law is when settling strifes (Gao, 1989, p. 560 Wei, 2000, p. 40 Sino contrary Joint-Venture impartiality hold 2). Types of Sino- impertinent Joint-Ventures in China Refer to auxiliary 1. Equity Joint-Venture (EJV) An beauteousness Joint-Venture in China takes the form of a limited obligation company (JVL Article 4 and Article 2 RICJVL Kluwer natural law inappropriate, 2005 Nee, O. D, 1992, 83-101). In this type of Joint-Venture some(prenominal) parties fall in to the registered capital and run a risks profits and losings are all taken in regards to the coincidence of that contri exactlyion.Four Basic attributes (Kluwer justice world-wide, 2005 Wei, 2000, p. 74-75) 1. Established in accordance to the law of the states Re creation of China. 2. Necessary quality or Capital 3. Possesses its own name, structure and premise 4. Assumes civil li skill independently. Cooperative (Contrac tual) Joint-Venture Creating Chinese jural Person (CJVCJP) Also a limited liability company which assumes responsibilities for the ventures list assets however croup receive a separate internal arrangement on debt liability of each party (Articles 11,12, 14 of RICJVL Wei, 2000, p. 5-76). The structure and status of this type of venture is a lot more than conciliative than for EJVs, with precise aspects being able to be defined by contract (Kluwer jurisprudence worldwide, 2005 Nee, O. D, 1992, 83-101). It also has liberty of negotiation of product or profit distribution manner while dumb being a separate legal person with the parties liability limited to their capital contributions (Article 14 of RICJVL China cable lawfulness Guide, 2005 Cooperative Joint-Venture equity and Cooperative Joint-Venture passing right).Cooperative (Contractual) Joint-Venture Not Creating Chinese juristic Person (CJVWCJP) Does non create a Chinese juristic person (Article 52 of RICJVL) and parties take unlimited liabilities for the debts of the Joint-Venture jointly and severally. alone investments are administered in a coordinated manner and consent is needed for the disposing of a partys investment (Nee, O. D, 1992, 83-101). &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212- It has unfreeze structure, high risk and low score of control and cooperation (Nee, O. D, 1992 Wei, 2000, p. 176). &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212-As all Chinese JVs are controlled infra the P. R. C law (Article 5 of the foreign scotch Contract natural law (FECL) Lewis, 1996, p. 31 Wei, 2000, p. 73), the ability to create their own contractual clauses and assume more freedom in the contractual social intercourseship is necessary, especially in regards to topics much(prenominal) as expert blank space that is why a Contractual Joint-Venture Creating Chinese Juristic Person is the best choice. Also, in copu lation to management and liability and the fruit of construct goods this type of Joint-Venture is ideal (China business sector practice of law Guide, 2005 Gomes-Casseres, 1990 Wei, 2000, p. 68). The out of expert Property From the sixth China world-wide naked Wall- create Materials, Equipment and engine room exhibition held in Beijing in May 2012, it puke be seen that unripe building is becoming increasingly everyday in China (GCiS, 2012). In detail the 12th Five-Year Plan states that by 2015, at least one billion of these should be built with eco-friendly building materials, and by 2020, grand buildings will account for more than 30% of new gimmick (ACBW, 2012 supplement 6 GCiS, 2012). however, with this novelty in green building rising and a lot more foreign producers developing products and technology in China so comes the business of treasure intellectual property. ingenious property shelter is relatively new in the good deals republic of China but its im portance continues to rise (Wheare, 1998, p. 1) and it is often cited as an issue of concern for foreign parties in China (Ding, 1997 Liesch & angstrom McGaughey, 2000, p. 1 Massey, J. , 2006-2007 Vanhonacker & international group Aere Pan, 1997). Traditionally the concept of protect intellectual property did not puzzle a whole hold in Chinese culture (Wei, 2000, p. 9), but Chinas reformation of its national IP scheme to comply with the international standards set fall out through the WTOs Trade associate Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement has been a leap for the development of Chinas view in regards to intellectual property (Wheare, 1998, p. 1). However, despite Chinas accomplishments in IP fortress and indications it will not become a haven of buc provideeering it still considered one of the most savage places to do business (Folsom & Minan, 1989, p. 792 Liesch & McGaughey, 2000 p. 2).This is due to its relative novelty in the states Republ ic devising certain segments of the population have provided a rather vague reason of the concept (Cohen et al. , 1996, p. 7). In the P. R. C the problem isnt that they dont have laws regulating IP protection. In event they have laws for the protection of Patents, Copyright attack and Trademarks. However, the problem comes when trying to implement these laws (Yuan, 2004, p. 1) as Chinese civil enforcement procedures make it very baffling to protect high technology transparents ( appendix 5 Kennedy and Clark, 2006 Zhang 2010 7).In addition an interesting concomitant to note is that passels judgeship may accept oral show up but in practice they seldom accept or put slant on this type of evidence (Kennedy and Clark, 2006). Therefore, when transaction with foreign parties it is important to develop and implement a comprehensive system for protecting their technology interests (Greguras, 2007, p. 3 Norris, 2011, p. 58 Wheare, 1998, p. 159). If it is fictive this wall pane ling company has already unmistakable their product in Australia, under Australias Patent law the manifest will last for 20 years (ALRC, 2012).As the product is already being produced in Australia it cant be patented in China. However, as China is part of WTO and is a signee on the TRIPS accordance, therefore they are politically and morally bound to spot the Australian patent (ALRC, 2012 Article 27. 1 of TRIPS Agreement WTO 2012). As the producers in China will need to have the production make do-how for the wall paneling, therefore there is risk of intellectual property theft. To try and protect the IP a license transcription for technology change could be considered.When vista up a technology conveying symmetricalness, the Technology Transfer Regulations as stipulated in the China jurisprudences for Foreign melodic line outlines in Article 2 six ship canal of technology acquisition (Appendix 2 Kluwer Law international, 2005). &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212 &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212- If licensing is chosen for the transfer of the patent and its technology in the Joint-Venture the usual licensing agreement is 10 years. However this is unremarkably permitted to extend to the behavior of the Joint-Venture (Lewis, 1996, p. 67). The agreement involved will put up the Chinese producers to use the technological know-how with it move to the licensor (the Australian side) once the Joint-Venture is terminated. However it mustiness be noted that the global consensus in China is that technology and know-how belong to the licensee at the end of the term and the licensor should not be able to restrict the licensee in its use of this information (Jianhua & Williams, 1998, p. 167 Lewis, 1996, p. 167).Therefore despite many another(prenominal) bureaus one can try and protect IP in China, the most important factor is to carry out due diligence and make sure that the knowhow has been protected as good as possible. The Issue of D ispute steadiness ascribable to a difference in legal form, heathenish values and business practices, China can be seen as a high risk business environment. In the case of any bitternesss a advance and understandable battle final result method playing and clause should be formed and include in the Joint-Venture contract (Wei, 2000, p. 154).It is crucial for JV parties to specify dispute block methods, relevant law and locale for resolving disputes (Chan & Suen, 2005). Under the law of the P. R. C, Sino foreign Joint-Ventures are allowed to select applicable law and the venue for the dispute liquidation in their contractual clause and Chinese law is unaccompanied an pick in this case (Dobkin, 1988, 79-80 FECL 1985 Lewis J. 1996, p. 256 Wei, 2000. p. 156). However Article 25 of the Law on Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint-Ventures (2005) provides that if a dispute arises, the dispute should be in kickoff obiter dictum make upd through friendly consultations to the c onsummation possible.If such consultations fail whence the dispute may be settled by arbitration or be referred to the Peoples Court (Lewis J. 1996, p. 255) Therefore it is recommended that in light of any breaches of contract or party disputes the first step should be negotiation. Negotiation is not legally adhere and can preserve the guanxi between both parties, whilst being the cheapest ADR method (Cheung and Suen, 2002 Dimatteo, 2003 p. 109). Also prone the law states that friendly consultation should be the first step it should be the first method tried.However if not successful a relevant arbitration can be included in the contract. The P. R. C has a flexible approach regarding dispute resolution and it can take place in China or abroad agree to Chinese rules or an international arbitration body (Lewis, 1996, p. 256). However, for this wall paneling company it is still recommended to have the arbitration carried out in China as make up is lower and it is more convenient and is enforceable (Dimatteo, 2003, 109). Many parties scared of using mainland Chinese arbitration rules have decided on arbitrating in Hong Kong.This is a great option for the wall paneling company as Hong Kong has adopted the UNCITRAL model law on arbitration and is considered an international arbitration middle with highly developed infrastructure (Brandt & Tomson, 2012, p. 18 Dobkin, 1988, 79-80 HKIAC, 2004). In addition, Hong Kong will able to give better advice on foreign related matters in English fashioning the process a lot drum sander (Lewis, 1996, p. 257 Srivastava, 2002, 197). A possible dispute resolution clause that could be included in the contract can be viewed in Appendix 3. &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212-If arbitration still has not produced any results litigation can be considered (Wei, 2000, p. 154) but in China it is usually viewed a s a last resort due to possible preconceived opinion present in the so licits and due to court proceeding being very extended and expensive and its also difficult to find lawyers competent to advise on foreign matters in English. Usually foreign parties will endeavour to ensure their disputes are resolved without Chinese courts as they are still unconfident because of the reported local protectionism (Bersani, 1994 Chan, 1997) The Issue of Language &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212-Which language should be use in the Joint-Venture contract? When dealing with foreign parties there can sometimes be large language barriers. This problem can often be solved by having a clear language agreement stipulated in the contract. It is common practice to have the contract in both acting languages. Although this can be rather expensive, it may avoid some major problems that could arise in the future (Lewis, 1996, p. 31). The Issue of finis Chinese parties may be averted to agreeing with the public and formal ending of a Joint-Venture, not wanting to discuss the end onwards even beginning (Xu, 2008).However, sometimes, as the Chinese saying goes, the foreign party efficacy find themselves in the same go to bed as the Chinese but with unlike dreams. This is why a termination clause is very important. Despite the conventionality of this clause, it is still a grey area the general practice is that foreign investors buy their dash in and then buy their way out if the situation turns bad. Chinese parties have been known to play corporate coerce with foreign investors as to block potence exit of the foreign party or to hold them liable for all losses (Xu, 2008).A Joint-Venture contract should have a flesh out termination clause which outlines the events allowing parties to terminate their involvement. It should also state the duration of the Joint-Venture. (Dimatteo 2003) Some railyard for termination are as follows (Lewis, 1996, p. 257) 1. achievement of the Joint-Venture term 2. softness to continue trading operations due to massive losses 3. Inability to continue operations due to the ill luck of one of the contracting parties to fulfill its contractual obligations 4. Inability to continue operations to heavy losses ca apply by force majeure or 5.Inability to attain the desired objectives of operations and the escape of future for development. Some other damage that may be included are set out in Appendix 4. *It is proposed that the tenure for this Joint-Venture should be set at an appropriate time so as to avoid the transfer of intellectual property. This time should be to begin with the patent protection runs out and before the licensing agreement runs out. &8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212 AppendicesAppendix 1 Business Structures in China (Yuwa Wei, 2000, investment in C hina. p. 169) Appendix 2 China Business Law Guide 2005 a) The subsidization of patent rights b) The assignment of the rights to apply for patents c) The licensing of patent exploitation d) The assignment of technical darks e) The provision of technical services and f) Other forms of transfer of technology. Appendix 3 Dispute Resolution Clause In the event of any dispute arising under this contract, the parties shall first make all necessary efforts to settle the dispute through friendly consultation.If it is impossible to settle the dispute in this way then the matter shall be submitted to arbitration before the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (Lewis, 1996, P. 255). Appendix 4 Grounds for Termination (Frenkel, 1998) 1. ill luck of a participant to make wait capital contribution 2. Failure of a participant to obtain necessary authorities approvals 3. Failure of the venture to reach a pre-agreed level of profitability 4. Management standstill 5. Failure of one partner to buy the shares of another. (Buy-Sell agreement) 6. An adverse and debilitating change in the law 7.Bankruptcy or insolvency of the Joint-Venture. In relation to IP even if there is a clear termination clause and licensing agreement relating to the breach for the use of IP and know how as mentioned before the general consensus in China is that licensed IP will be able to be used once the license agreement has ended by the licensee. This means that despite efforts to protect IP, there is still a contingency of a breach and this should be mute as Chinas cultural view is different and they still have a developing legal system in relation to this problem. Appendix 5 Key Issues in Enforcing IP Law (Kennedy, G. amp Clark. D, 2006) The key issues are 1. courteous procedure law puts a strong burden on complainants to demonstrate their case. There are no rules specifically chemise the burden of proof if a plaintiff makes out a prima facie case. This can make it very difficult to at tempt that a high technology patent has been infringed, or a trade secret has been misappropriated. (Article 125, Contracting Law) 2. There is no breakthrough in civil proceedings. Parties are only required to submit evidence that assists their case. Without discovery, it can be extremely difficult to prove a case. Article 125, Contracting Law) 3. spontaneous evidence is very rarely veritable in civil proceedings (63 and 72 of Civil Procedure Law) oral evidence of misbehaviour by an employee will therefore be very hard to use. Appendix 6 Expected Growth of China colour Buildings (MOHURD, GCiS). Reference List 1. Austrade, 2012, Building Materials to China, easy at <http//www. austrade. gov. au/Building-materials-to-China/default. aspx>. Accessed on 22/10/2012. 2. Australian Business Forum (ACBW), 2012, China to Boost construction of verdure Building. May 7th. Available at <http//australianbusinessforum. om. au/_blog/ACBW_Feature_Articles/post/China_to_boost_constructio n_of_green_buildings/>. Accessed on 23/10/2012. 3. Australian Law repossess Commission (ALRC), 2012, Duration of Patent Protection, Australian Government. Available at <http//www. alrc. gov. au/publications/5-domestic-legal-framework/duration-patent-protection>. Accessed on 25/09/2012. 4. Brandt, M. & Tomson, K. , 2012, Hong Kongs state and elevation immunity immunity for state-owned enterprises? Published by SNR Consulting and ratified Services, Hong Kong. 5. Chan, E. H. W Suen, H. C.H, 2005, Dispute resolution management for international construction projects in China, Management Decision, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 589-602. 6. Cheung, S. O, and Suen, C. H, 2002, A multi-attribute service program model for dispute resolution strategy selection. tress Management Economy, Issue No. 20, 557-568. 7. Chinese Civil Procedure Law 1991. Available at http//www. China. org. cn/ incline/ governing/207343. htm. Accessed on 16/10/2012. 8. Chinese Contract Law of 1999, in The newly Co ntract Law in the Peoples Republic of China and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts A Brief resemblance by Zhang, Y.Q. Huang, D. H. Available at http//www. unidroit. org/english/publications/review/articles/2000-3-zhang-e. pdf. Accessed on 14/09/2012. 9. Chinese Law on Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint-Ventures, 2005. Available at http//www. hecpb. gov. cn/english/news/display. php? id=1. Accessed on 15/10/2012. 10. Chinese Patent Law 1984 as amend on 1 July 2001 and its Implementing Rules. 11. Coale, M. T. B. , 2001-2002, Stabilisation clauses in International Petroleum Transactions. Denver daybook of International Legislation and Policy, 222. 12. Cohen, M. A. , Bang, A. E. , Mitchell, S.J. ,1999, Chinese Intellectual Property Law and devote. Kluwer Law International. The Hague, The Netherlands. 13. Dimatteo, L. A, 2003, The Law of International Business Transactions, Thomson Learning. USA. 14. Ding, D. Z. , 1997, Control, conflict and execution of instr ument A study of US Chinese Joint-Ventures. daybook of International Marketing, 5(3) 3145. 15. Dobkin, J. A. , 1988, International Technology Joint-Ventures in the Countries of the Pacific Rim, Butterworths, joined States. 16. Frenkel, W. G. , 1998, Legal Protection against Risks Involved in Doing Business in the Republics of the Former U.S. S. R. International Quarterly (10), 395, 467. 17. Folsom, R. H. , Mina, J. H. , 1989, Law in the Peoples Republic of China Commentary, readings and Materials. Martinus Nijhoff. 18. Gao, Y. F, 1989, scotch Contract Law in China, in Ralph H Folsom and John H Minan (eds. ), Law in the Peoples Republic of China Commentary, Readings and Materials. Martinus Nijhoff. 19. GCiS China Strategic question, 2012, Green and Eco Friendly Materials Are the Latest maculation in Chinas Construction Market. Available at http//www. gcis. com. n/GCiS%20Commentary/Green%20and%20Eco%20Friendly%20Materials%20Are%20the%20Latest%20Spotlight%20in%20China%27s%20Const ruction%20Market. htm. Accessed on 22/10/2012. 20. Gelatt, T. A, 1989, Chinas New Cooperative Joint-Venture Law, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce. 15, 2 p. 187. 21. Gomes-Casseres, B. , 1989, Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic appearance and Organization, 11 1-25. 22. Greguras, F. , 2007, Intellectual Property system and Best Practices for R & D Services in China, Published by Compensation Law & Securities. 3. Hong Kong international Arbitration centre (HKIAC), 2004, Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre Home page. Available at <http//www. hkiac. com/>. Accessed on 25/09/2012. 24. Jianhua, Z. & Williams, M. , 1998, Foreign Trade and Contract Law in China, Published by Sweet & Maxwell Asia Hong Kong. 25. Kennedy, G. & Clark, D, 2006, Outsourcing to China Risks and benefits, data processor Law & Security Review, garishness 22, Issue 3, Pages 250253. 26. Kluwer Law International, 2005, China Business Law Guide (First Edition), The Hague, The Netherlands. 27.Law of the Peoples Republic of China on Foreign-related Economic Contracts(FECL), 1985, Available at http//www. fdi. gov. cn/pub/FDI_EN/Laws/GeneralLawsandRegulations/BasicLaws/P020060620319304687511. pdf. Accessed on 24/10/2012 28. Lewis, D. J, 1996, The Life and Death of a Joint-Venture in China. Asia Law Practice Publishing Ltd and Euromoney (Jersey) Ltd. Hong Kong. 29. Liesch, P. W McGaughey, S. L, 2000, An Unconventional Approach to Intellectual Property Protection The Case of an Australian steadfastly Transferring Shipbuilding Technologies to China. Journal of World Business 35(1). 30. Massey, J.A. , 2006-2007, The Emperor Is Far away Chinas Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Protection, Chicago Journal of International Law, 231 (7). 31. Nee, O. D. , 1992, Chapter in Joint-Ventures in East Asia Legal Issues by Jacques Buhart, Graham and Trotman, London. 32. Norris, J. T. , 2011 January, Chin a Foreign Direct Investment Greenfield, Mergers & Acquisition, Or Joint-Venture. The International Business and Economics Research Journal (10) (1). 33. Rules for Implementation of Chinese Joint-Venture Law (RICJVL), 1995. Available at http//www. asianlii. org/cn/legis/cen/laws/drftiotscjv805/.Accessed on 03/10/2012. 34. Smith, J. IP Protection in China Practical Strategies (Second Edition), 1998, Asia Law & Practice Publishing Ltd and Euromoney (Jersey) Ltd. Hong Kong. 35. Srivastava, D. , 2002, Business Law in Hong Kong, Published by Sweet & Maxwell Asia Hong Kong. 36. Vanhonacker, W. R. , & Pan, Y, 1997, The impact of national culture, business scope and geographic post on Joint-Venture operations in China. Journal of International Marketing, 5(3) 1130. 37. Wei, Yuwa, 2000, Investing in China The Law and Practice of Joint-Ventures, The coalition Press, Sydney.